• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login ▼
    • Login
    • Register
  • العربیة
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Alexandria Science Exchange Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 43 (2022)
Volume Volume 42 (2021)
Issue Issue 4
OCTOBER- DECEMBER
Issue Issue 3
July-September
Issue Issue 2
APRIL-JUNE
Issue JANUARY- MARCH
Volume Volume 41 (2020)
Volume Volume 40 (2019)
Volume Volume 39 (2018)
Volume Volume 38 (2017)
Volume Volume 37 (2016)
Volume Volume 36 (2015)
Volume Volume 35 (2014)
Volume Volume 34 (2013)
Volume Volume 33 (2012)
Volume Volume 32 (2011)
Volume Volume 31 (2010)
Volume Volume 30 (2009)
Volume Volume 29 (2008)
Volume Volume 28 (2007)
Attia, A., El-Saadany, M., Melouk, O., Atty Mohamed, G. (2021). The competitiveness of the Most Important Egyptian Fruits in the Markets of the BRICS Countries. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 42(3), 1619-1634. doi: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.189413
Azza Nabeeh Attia; Mostafa El-Saadany; Olfat Aly Melouk; Gaber Abdel Atty Mohamed. "The competitiveness of the Most Important Egyptian Fruits in the Markets of the BRICS Countries". Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 42, 3, 2021, 1619-1634. doi: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.189413
Attia, A., El-Saadany, M., Melouk, O., Atty Mohamed, G. (2021). 'The competitiveness of the Most Important Egyptian Fruits in the Markets of the BRICS Countries', Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 42(3), pp. 1619-1634. doi: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.189413
Attia, A., El-Saadany, M., Melouk, O., Atty Mohamed, G. The competitiveness of the Most Important Egyptian Fruits in the Markets of the BRICS Countries. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal, 2021; 42(3): 1619-1634. doi: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.189413

The competitiveness of the Most Important Egyptian Fruits in the Markets of the BRICS Countries

Article 23, Volume 42, Issue 3, September 2021, Page 1619-1634  XML PDF (272.55 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2021.189413
Authors
Azza Nabeeh Attia email 1; Mostafa El-Saadany* 2; Olfat Aly Melouk* 2; Gaber Abdel Atty Mohamed* 2
1Damanhour university - Faculty of agriculture
2Faculty of Agriculture - Damanhour University
Abstract
The main objective of this research was to identify the production situation of oranges and grapes in Egypt and the relative importance of Egyptian exports of them to the BRICS countries, and to estimate some of the competitiveness parameters for both crops within the BRICS’s markets.
The competitive parameters for Egyptian oranges and grapes in the markets of the BRICS countries, clearly shows that the market share of Egyptian oranges in the markets of Russia, China, India, Brazil and South Africa amounted to about 63.9%, 13.3%, 81.1%, 0.1%, 3.1% respectively, during the average period (2015-2019), while the market share of Egyptian grapes in each of them was about 5.2%, 0.04%, 5.9%, 0.01%, 39.6%, respectively, during the same period, which indicates a low market share for Egyptian oranges in The markets of Brazil and South Africa, as well as a low market share of Egyptian grapes in the markets of China and Brazil.
It is clear from the price competitiveness criteria that there is a price advantage for Egyptian oranges in the markets of the BRICS countries compared to the prices of the competing countries, namely Morocco, Turkey, South Africa, Spain, Australia and the United States of America, while it was found that there is no price advantage for Egyptian grapes in those markets compared to the prices of each of Turkey And Maldova, while it had a price advantage over the prices of Chilean grapes in the Russian market. In the South African market, it was found that there is a price advantage for Egyptian grapes compared to the prices of Spain and Zambia, and that there is no price advantage for it compared to the prices of Namibia. In the Chinese market, it was found that there is a price advantage for Egyptian grapes compared to the prices of grapes in Australia, Chile and Peru. In the Indian market, it was found that there is a price advantage for Egyptian grapes compared to the prices of American, Peruvian and Chinese grapes.
The results of the study indicate an increase in the value of Egypt’s apparent comparative advantage factor in the export of oranges, estimated at about 23.9 during the average period (2015-2019), while its counterpart for the competing countries, namely South Africa, Spain, and the United States of America, amounted to about 21.3, 7.6, and 1.2, respectively. This coefficient of Egyptian grapes was about 7.2, while its counterpart for the competing countries, which are Chile, Italy, and the United States of America, was about 17.1, 2.6, and 1 respectively.
By estimating the market penetration rate of Egyptian oranges and grapes during the average period (2015-2019), it was found that its value is greater than one for Egyptian oranges in the markets of Russia, South Africa and China, which means the ease of penetration of Egyptian oranges to those markets, and less than one in the markets of Brazil and India, which means the difficulty of penetrating of the Egyptian oranges through those markets. It was also found that the value of the market penetration coefficient for Egyptian grapes is greater than the correct one during the same period in the markets of Russia and Brazil, which means that it is easy to penetrate those markets and it accounted for less than one in the markets of South Africa, China and India, which means that it is difficult to penetrate those markets.
Main Subjects
Agricultural economics
Statistics
Article View: 107
PDF Download: 118
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.