p. 391−405
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 406−414
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 415−418
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 419−426
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 427−440
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 441−450
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 451−470
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 471−486
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 487−501
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 502−510
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 511−516
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
10-20 > 20-30 cm soil depth. The results revealed that the values of field capacity (FC), available water (AW), H.C, quickly drainable pores (QDP) and water holding pore (WHP) increased significantly by increasing the rate of RS and GR. Moreover, combine RS + each of 6.8, 8.2 and 10.2 ton.fed-1 AGR was increased highly significant effect on, FC , AW, H.C, QDP and WHP as compared to treated by RS, AGR alone or control. Also, it was decreased significantly on PR, bulk density and fine capillary pore. ESP valuesdecrease by leaching control was not considerable andthe soil remained sodic with highly ESP values. However, the final ESPobtained after leaching with amendments gave the highest decrease percent in ESP values by using combine 0.5% RS + each of 6.8, 8.2 and 10.2 ton. fed-1 AGR. Also, the fresh yield of Spinach was higher in soils receiving with increasing rates of AG amendment as compared to RS. The highest shoot spinach yield was, obtained by treatment by combine of 0.5% RS + each of 6.8, 8.2 and 10.2 ton. fed-1 AGR.]]>
p. 517−533
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 534−549
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 550−559
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 229−238
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 239−246
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 347−258
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 259−281
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 282−285
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 286−292
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 293−299
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 300−327
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September
p. 328−342
2536-9784
Vol.40/No.July-September